000,

respectively) for patients with reduced serum zinc levels. Serum zinc levels remained an independent risk factor for development of hepatic encephalopathy (OR = .82 ; 95% CI: .73-.92; p = .001) and hepatorenal syndrome (OR = .79 ; 95% CI: .68-.91; p = .001) when subjected to multivariate analysis. Furthermore, actuarial survival free of liver transplantation was reduced for patients with low serum zinc levels (low zinc: 22.2 months; 95% CI: 17.4–27.0 vs. normal zinc: 30.1 months; 95% CI: 25.5–35.0; p = .003). see more Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are particularly affected by reduced zinc levels (low zinc: 12.5 months ± 2.4; 95% CI: 7.7–17.2 vs. normal zinc: 39.1 months ± 4.7; 95% CI: 29.8–48.5) resulting in impaired survival (p =.001) while this was not the case for patients with viral liver disease (p =.294), alcoholic liver diseaes (p =.545) or patients classified with other Sorafenib in vitro hepatic disorder (p =.087). In PSC patients, serum zinc levels remained an independent predictor of survival when subjected to multivariate analysis (OR = .80; 95% CI: .64-.98; p = .038). Conclusions: We were able to identify serum zinc levels as a predictor

of reduced survival in ESLD patients, particularly in PSC patients. Whether zinc supplementation might be beneficial for patients on liver transplantation list needs to be further addressed. Disclosures: The following people have nothing to disclose: Kilian Friedrich, Christian Rupp, Andreas Wannhoff, Wolfgang Stremmel, Daniel Gotthardt

Background: Patients are prioritized for liver transplantation (LT) by their anticipated 90-day wait list mortality using the MELD score, but 上海皓元 the MELD underestimates wait list mortality when hyponatremia is present. A revised MELD that incorporates the added mortality due to hyponatremia, the MELD-Na, was shown to reduce wait list mortality in hyponatremic patients in a modeling study. In UNOS Region 6, regional agreement has resulted in prioritization of cirrhotic patients with hyponatremia for LT using a MELD-Na exception since 2008. Aims: (1) Determine if patients granted a MELD-Na exception in Region 6 have similar waitlist mortality compared to patients with similar MELD scores without hyponatremia. (2) Determine if patients granted a MELD-Na exception in Region 6 have similar post-transplant survival compared to patients with similar MELD scores without hyponatremia. Methods: In the UNOS registry, we selected all patients listed for LT in Region 6 from Jan 2008 to Mar 2014 who received a MELD-Na prioritization exception based on regional agreement. We compared their wait list mortality to a MELD-matched group listed for LT without hyponatremia using multiple Cox regression. We then compared post-LT mortality of MELD-Na prioritized patients who received LT with a MELD-matched group without hyponatremia who received LT using multiple Cox regression.