02 (95% confidence interval = 20.13-1002.22) and aneurysm size (odds ratio = 1.28 for each 1-mm increase in diameter, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is fairly selleck safe from a neuro-ophthalmic perspective, with some treatment-related morbidity being transient and minor. Although rare, an irreversible deficit is possible and

should be taken into account when considering preventive treatment.”
“The aim of the present study was to determine serum levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and leptin in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) at diagnosis and after imatinib therapy when patients achieved a complete molecular remission. The study was conducted on 22 patients with CML in the chronic phase and 10 healthy subjects. The median serum NGAL levels in CML patients at diagnosis were significantly higher compared to age-matched controls. After imatinib therapy, all patients achieved complete molecular remission and NGAL levels decreased and were found significantly lower with respect to the baseline. No significant correlations were found between NGAL levels

and other disease parameters. Before imatinib therapy, the median blood leptin levels were not significantly different from those of controls. After therapy with imatinib, all patients in molecular remission presented an increase in leptin levels. Buparlisib ic50 Future research is eagerly awaited as it may demonstrate the real role of NGAL and leptin in the onset and progression of CML. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel”
“Rationale: Delirium is often unrecognized this website in ICU patients and associated with poor outcome. Screening for ICU delirium is recommended by several medical organizations to improve early diagnosis and treatment. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) has high sensitivity and specificity for delirium when administered by research nurses. However, test characteristics of the CAM-ICU as performed in routine practice are

unclear.\n\nObjectives: To investigate the diagnostic value of the CAM-ICU in daily practice.\n\nMethods: Teams of three delirium experts including psychiatrists, geriatricians, and neurologists visited 10 ICUs twice. Based on cognitive examination, inspection of medical files, and Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision criteria for delirium, the expert teams classified patients as awake and not delirious, delirious, or comatose. This served as a gold standard to which the CAM-ICU as performed by the bedside ICU-nurses was compared. Assessors were unaware of each other’s conclusions.\n\nMeasurements and Main Results: Fifteen delirium experts assessed 282 patients of whom 101 (36%) were comatose and excluded.