Importantly, long-term propagation under high-density (as compared with sub-confluent) with extensive contact among cells have been shown to increase their saturation density, increase tumor incidence and decrease the latent period of tumor appearance after injection of cells into mice [43], [44] and [45]. The HD 10–87 VERO cells formed tumors in

NB and adult nude mice at p185 compared with p194 for LD 10–87 VERO cells in NB mice. Since doubling time for HD VERO cells was shorter (20 h) than LD VERO cells (26 h), it is conceivable that the faster proliferation rate, driven by selective pressures, may contribute to the enhanced tumor forming capacity of HD VERO cells. However, the association of signature miRNA over-expression appears to be related to the expression of the VERO cell tumorigenic phenotype rather than INK1197 nmr to the passage density buy Cisplatin or the reagents (tissue culture medium and serum) used for cell culture. This correlation between the passage at which the cells first expressed a detectable tumorigenic phenotype and the passage representing the peak expression levels of signature miRNAs illustrated that these miRNAs are potential biomarkers for the expression of the VERO cell tumorigenic phenotype. A comparison of the miRNA expression patterns between tumorigenic VERO cells and its corresponding tumor tissue may provide additional evidence supporting the specificity

of the miRNAs’ expression patterns to the expression of tumorigenic phenotype in VERO cells. In the present study, signature miRNAs were not monitored in tumor tissue formed by injection of tumorigenic VERO cells. However, a cell line established from a tumor formed from LD VERO cells at p250 had the same pattern of miRNA expression as the inoculated LD VERO cells [28]. Moreover, individual miRNAs such as miR-376a have been reported as highly expressed in different cancer tissues and cells when compared with the corresponding normal tissues and cells [28], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51] and [52]. Thus, the concordance between the expression of signature the miRNAs and the miRNAs

previously identified in other tumor tissues suggests that these miRNAs are involved in the process of neoplastic development in VERO cells. Although individual miRNAs alone can be considered for use as a test for tumorigenic potential of VERO cells, the diverse and complex molecular events involved in the initiation and development of neoplasia argues against the use of individual miRNAs as tumor biomarkers. Thus, we propose that these six miRNAs be used as a panel of biomarkers for tumorigenic VERO cells, as the combination of these miRNAs may reflect various aspects of tumorigenesis and form a more complete indicator of the VERO cell tumorigenic phenotype. Understanding how these six miRNAs contribute to the neoplastic progression of VERO cells and their ability to form tumors would contribute to their usefulness as biomarkers for the expression of the VERO cell tumorigenic phenotype.