A multi-center double blind placebo controlled phase III trial was conducted at Delhi, Pune and Vellore in India between March 11, 2011 and September 26, 2013 [9]. The study was approved by the site Ethics Committees, the Department of Biotechnology (India) and the Western Institutional Review Board (USA), and conducted in compliance with

the protocol, good Dinaciclib supplier clinical practices, and national regulatory and ethics guidelines. Informed written consent was taken from parents at enrollment. The detailed methods and study procedures have been previously described [9]. Briefly, a total of 6799 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the vaccine or placebo using the Interactive Voice Response System or Interactive Web Response Abiraterone System with a block size of 12. Enrolled infants were administered the 116E vaccine or placebo along with the childhood vaccines (a pentavalent vaccine including Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus, Haemophilus influenzae b and Hepatitis B, and Oral Polio Vaccine) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age. Infants were excluded if they had received a rotavirus vaccine, if they had documented immunodeficiency, chronic gastroenteritis or any other disorder that was deemed necessary for exclusion by the investigator. Infants were temporarily excluded if they had any illness needing hospital referral

or diarrhea on the day of enrollment. The 116E vaccine or placebo was administered 5–10 min after administration of 2.5 mL of citrate bicarbonate buffer. Families were

contacted weekly at home by trained field workers for ascertaining efficacy and safety outcomes. Trained field workers collected information on characteristics very of gastroenteritis episodes for each day. A stool sample was collected for each episode of gastroenteritis. Mothers were provided mobile phones to ensure easy access to study physicians, who were available round the clock for management of illness. Medical care including transportation and hospitalization were facilitated and paid for by the study [9]. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe RVGE (≥11 on the Vesikari scale) [10]. The secondary outcomes being reported include severe RVGE requiring hospitalization or supervised rehydration therapy, very severe RVGE, RVGE of any severity and others. Diarrheal stools were examined for rotavirus with a commercial enzyme immunoassay (Premier Rotaclone, Meridian Bioscience, USA). Rotaclone-positive stools were analyzed for G (VP7) and P (VP4) genotypes by multiplex PCR [11] and [12]. If both were negative, a PCR assay for the VP6 gene was done to adjudicate where the ELISA result was a false positive [13]. The genotyping assay was not designed to differentiate vaccine G9P[11] from wild G9P[11].