In most cases of NTFP extraction, the importance

of factors such as the breeding system and the effective population size of the plant involved – in supporting regeneration, the persistence of stands and the sustainability of harvesting – has not been considered (Ticktin, 2004). When some thought has been given to these issues (e.g., Alexiades and Shanley, 2005), the quoted effects of harvesting on genetic structure and the associated impacts on production and persistence are generally suppositions only, with no direct confirmatory measurements. One opportunity for MI-773 in vivo understanding genetic-related impacts on NTFPs may come from building on the growing literature of the effects of logging on timber trees, although different harvesting methods, products, rates of growth and reproductive biologies mean that the ability to make generalisations is limited (see below). A number of timber species have been hypothesised to undergo dysgenic selection based on only inferior individuals not being logged, which thereby contribute disproportionately to the seed crop for the establishment of subsequent generations (Pennington et al., 1981). Reductions in genetic diversity,

and changes in timber tree stand structure and density that change mating patterns, can lead to inbreeding depression (Lowe et al., 2005). Actual data Z-VAD-FMK concentration on how changes in the genetic structure of logged tree populations influence production volumes, timber quality and economic value, however, are very limited, and the importance of dysgenic selection is itself disputed (Cornelius et al., 2005). Most studies of logging impacts on the genetic structure of timber trees have involved phenotypically-neutral tuclazepam molecular markers to measure diversity rather than measurements of growth, seed viability, etc. (Wickneswari et al., 2014, this special issue). Such research has revealed varying effects of logging on genetic structure, with diversity significantly reduced in some cases (e.g., André et al., 2008 and Carneiro et al., 2011)

but not in others (e.g., Cloutier et al., 2007 and Fageria and Rajora, 2013). It appears that more important than losses in genetic diversity per se are changes in gene flow and breeding behaviour ( Lowe et al., 2005). Jennings et al. (2001) suggested that logging impacts on timber trees will be limited because individuals generally set seed before they are cut and many juveniles that eventually take the place of adults are not removed during logging. NTFPs that are harvested by tree cutting at maturity could be subject to similar limited effects, while the impacts of destructive harvesting before maturity will likely be greater because fewer individuals then seed and a larger cohort can be exploited. When the NTFP is the seed or the fruit, the effects of intensive harvesting on genetic structure may be high, especially if the seed/fruit are harvested by tree felling (Vásquez and Gentry, 1989).