Moreover, consistent with our biochemical data, the increase in dendritic BDNF expression induced by AMPAR blockade was due to de novo synthesis, given that it was prevented by the translation inhibitors anisomycin and emetine (Figures 6F and 6G). Interestingly, blocking background spiking activity with TTX did not prevent the ability of AMPAR blockade to enhance dendritic BDNF expression in HSP inhibitor a protein synthesis-dependent manner (Figure 6H), suggesting that blockade of AP-independent miniature events are sufficient to drive changes in BDNF synthesis. Hence, although the downstream consequences

of BDNF synthesis are gated by coincident activity in presynaptic terminals, the synthesis of BDNF appears more tightly linked

with excitatory synaptic drive and the postsynaptic impact of miniature synaptic transmission. Previous studies have documented the importance of local dendritic protein synthesis in forms of homeostatic plasticity induced, in whole or part, by targeting postsynaptic receptors with antagonists (Ju et al., 2004, Sutton et al., 2006 and Aoto et al., 2008). Thus, the increase in dendritic BDNF expression could be due to localized dendritic synthesis or alternatively, due to somatic synthesis and subsequent transport selleck chemicals into dendrites. It is well established that BDNF mRNA is localized to dendrites (Tongiorgi et al., 1997 and An et al., 2008) and that miniature synaptic events regulate dendritic translation

efficiency (Sutton et al., 2004), supporting the possibility that AMPAR blockade induces local BDNF synthesis not in dendrites. To examine this possibility, we assessed the effects of locally blocking protein synthesis in dendrites by using restricted microperfusion of emetine during global AMPAR blockade. When locally administered 15 min prior to and throughout bath CNQX treatment (40 μM; 60 min), emetine produced a selective decrease in dendritic BDNF expression in the presence of coincident bath CNQX application (Figure 7). Again, these local changes in BDNF expression were specific, given that local administration of emetine had no effect on MAP2 expression in the same neurons, nor did local emetine have any effect on BDNF expression without coincident CNQX treatment (Figure 7D). These results thus indicate that the selective increase in dendritic BDNF expression induced by AMPAR blockade reflects localized dendritic BDNF synthesis. Taken together, our results suggest that AMPAR blockade induces local BDNF synthesis in dendrites which, in turn, selectively drives state-dependent compensatory increases in release probability from active presynaptic terminals. We have shown that different facets of synaptic activity play unique roles in shaping the manner by which neurons homeostatically adjust pre- and postsynaptic function to compensate for acute loss of activity.