Such use of the WBV has been clinically observed in the bone of low bone density child population [21] and [26] and a positive impact of WBV on the muscle was already reported in young OI patients [27]. Further investigations are required to confirm and optimize www.selleckchem.com/products/sch-900776.html the osteogenic effects of the WBV (vibration frequency, acceleration or treatment duration and length) in young children and to determine if the beneficial effects would last during adulthood. This investigation

has been funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant number: 089807/Z/09/Z). “
“Mechanostat theory suggests that bone remodeling is highly dependent on bone strain [1], a result of mechanical loading, which can include external impact forces and internal muscle forces [2]. This theory is well illustrated in elite athletes as they are often exposed to extreme loading environments, which is a rare occurrence in the general population. For example, athletes involved in high-impact sports check details such as volleyball and hurdling that are characterized by both high strain magnitude and strain rate

have approximately 19–25% higher bone mineral content (BMC) and 37–44% higher polar section modulus (a surrogate for bone strength) at the distal tibia after adjusting for body size, when compared with those in low-impact sports, such as swimming [3]. Although previous studies investigating bone properties in athletes have provided insight into mechanisms of bone adaptation, most are limited by the imaging technology used to measure bone parameters. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD, g/cm2) and has also been used in conjunction with hip structural analysis, which when applied to DXA images can estimate structural parameters at the femur

such as cross-sectional area (cm2), section modulus (cm3), and buckling ratio [4] and [5]. For example, this technique has revealed that male gymnasts and runners aged 18–35 have higher cross-sectional area of the proximal femur when compared with controls [6]. Although this technique has proven beneficial for our understanding of how bone can adapt to mechanical stimuli, the two-dimensional nature of this modality makes the measurement Thiamet G of true volumetric bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm3) of the cortical and trabecular compartments impossible [7], [8], [9] and [10]. More recent studies addressed this issue using three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) [3], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and [17]. These studies provided further insight into how loading may affect bone mass, BMD, bone geometry, and estimated bone strength in the upper and lower extremities. However, it remains unclear how impact loading influences detailed aspects of bone micro-architecture, a key determinant of bone strength [18], [19] and [20].