When peripheral iHFS was applied, however, this continued

When peripheral iHFS was applied, however, this continued

increase was prevented. In contrast, rTMS produced an improvement in tactile acuity, which remained stable for at least 25 min after the end of stimulation, and was not affected by the additional application of iHFS. During the last few years, stimulation with pairs of stimuli in close succession (paired-pulse Entinostat clinical trial stimulation) has become a common tool to investigate short-term plasticity. This is a useful technique to investigate changes in, and the balance between, cortical excitation and intracortical inhibition. Paired-pulse suppression describes the phenomenon that, at short ISIs, neuronal responses to the second stimulus are significantly reduced. Paired-pulse suppression is quantified in terms of the ratio of the Thiazovivin amplitude of the second response divided by the first. That means that large ratios are associated with reduced paired-pulse suppression, and small amplitude ratios are associated with stronger paired-pulse suppression. The fact that the second

response of two stimuli given in short succession is strongly suppressed has often been denoted as a special form of short-term plasticity, which describes changes of neural behaviour resulting from prior activity (Zucker, 1989; Zucker & Regehr, 2002). Paired magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex is frequently used to characterize different forms of intracortical inhibition and facilitation (Kujirai et al., 1993; Chen, 2004; Di Lazzaro et al., 2005). In these studies, GABAergic interneurons have been suggested as mediators of paired-pulse inhibition. However, the cellular mechanism underlying paired-pulse Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase suppression of SEPs is not yet fully understood. According to in vitro studies, GABAergic inhibition appears to also play an important role in paired-pulse

suppression (Porter & Nieves, 2004; Torres-Escalante et al., 2004). Höffken et al. (2010) reported that, with an ISI of 30 ms, there is no paired-pulse suppression of potentials originating in the cranial medulla, suggesting that, at this ISI, paired-pulse suppression must occur at least at the level of the thalamus or intracortically. The increase in cortical excitability after the 5-Hz rTMS stimulation was similar for both groups. This finding is consistent with previously published results, where this effect was seen after a similar rTMS application (Ragert et al., 2004). Furthermore, there was a significant further increase in excitability demonstrated in the last measurement for the group that did not receive iHFS. This suggests that there is a time window in which the effect of rTMS on cortical excitability continues to build up, even after stimulation has ceased, before it begins to return to baseline. Similar findings have been reported elsewhere, e.g.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>