While this account does not explain why conceptual primes lead specifically to R judgments (and only for studied items), it might explain why we have not yet found reliable evidence of increased selleck screening library R judgments in experiments that use conceptual primes only (i.e., with no repetition primes in other blocks; Taylor and Henson, in press). More importantly, this account is consistent with other experiments that have used the Jacoby and Whitehouse paradigm, but asked for independent ratings of both Remembering and Knowing on each trial (e.g., using a 1–4 scale for each; an alternative procedure introduced by Higham and Vokey, 2004). These

experiments, by Kurilla and Westerman (2008), and Brown and Bodner (2011), replicated the finding that masked repetition primes only affect K judgments under the standard (exclusive) R/K procedure, but found that they affected both R and K ratings under the independent ratings procedure. In other words, even masked repetition primes (not just conceptual primes) appear to increase

participants’ experiences of Remembering, as long as participants are allowed to rate this independently of their experience of Knowing. If one hypothesizes that the processes of recollection and familiarity are mutually exclusive (e.g., Gardiner et al., 1998, 2002), then the use of binary R/K response categories follows naturally; however, if one believes that recollection and familiarity I BET 762 Alectinib are independent or redundant (e.g., Knowlton and Squire, 1995; Mayes et al., 2007), then the interpretation of binary R/K responses becomes less straightforward. In the latter

case, measures such as “independence” K scores (the proportion of trials not given an R response that were given a K response; Yonelinas and Jacoby, 1995) may be computed in order to estimate recollection and familiarity from binary R/K responses. Nonetheless, the critical concern here is the signal sent to the participant by the use of binary response categories – that Remembering and Knowing are mutually-exclusive experiences – the effects of which cannot be removed statistically. One alternative way to test these mappings is to look for convergent evidence from neuroimaging. A large number of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments have investigated the brain regions associated with many different operationalizations of recollection and familiarity: Not just using R/K judgments, but also using objective tests of source retrieval, confidence ratings, and other means. A notably consistent set of regions has emerged in relation to recollection, viz regions in medial and lateral parietal cortex ( Wagner et al., 2005) and in the hippocampus ( Diana et al., 2007).