In their view, however, these impacts are seen as much different

In their view, however, these impacts are seen as much different in scale than those that come later: Preindustrial societies could and did modify coastal and terrestrial ecosystems but they did not have the numbers, social and economic organisation, or technologies needed to equal or dominate the great forces of Nature in magnitude or rate. ABT-263 mouse Their impacts remained largely local and transitory, well within

the bounds of the natural variability of the environment (Steffen et al., 2007:615; also see Steffen et al., 2011:846–847). Here, we review archeological and paleoecological evidence for rapid and widespread faunal extinctions after the initial colonization of continental and island landscapes. While the timing and precise mechanisms of extinction (e.g., coincident climate change, overharvesting, invasive species, habitat disruption, GSK 3 inhibitor disease, or extraterrestrial impact) still are debated (Haynes, 2009), the global pattern of first human arrival followed by biotic extinctions, that accelerate through time, places humans as a contributing agent to extinction for at least 50,000 years. From the late Pleistocene to the Holocene, moreover, we argue that human contributions to such extinctions and ecological change have continued to accelerate. More than

simply the naming of geologic epochs, defining the level of human involvement in ancient extinctions may have widespread ethical implications for the present and future of conservation biology and restoration ecology (Donlan et al., 2005 and Wolverton, 2010). A growing number of scientists and resource managers accept the premise that humans caused or significantly contributed to late Quaternary extinctions and, we have the moral imperative to restore and rebalance these ecosystems by introducing species closely related to those that became extinct. also Experiments are already underway in “Pleistocene

parks” in New Zealand, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Latvia, and the Russian Far East (Marris, 2009), and scientists are debating the merits of rewilding North America with Old World analog species (Caro, 2007, Oliveira-Santos and Fernandez, 2010 and Rubenstein et al., 2006). One enduring debate in archeology revolves around the role of anatomically modern humans (AMH, a.k.a. Homo sapiens) in the extinction of large continental, terrestrial mammals (megafauna). As AMH populations spread from their evolutionary homeland in Africa between about 70,000 and 50,000 years ago ( Klein, 2008), worldwide megafauna began a catastrophic decline, with about 90 of 150 genera ( Koch and Barnosky, 2006:216) going extinct by 10,000 cal BP (calendar years before present). A variety of scientists have weighed in on the possible cause(s) of this extinction, citing natural climate and habitat change, human hunting, disease, or a combination of these ( Table 2).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>